Comparing the Starlink Enterprise Dish versus the Flat High Performance Dish

April 14, 2025

Comparing the Starlink Enterprise Dish versus the Flat High Performance Dish

Table of contents

Overview

Starlink offers multiple Dish types for both consumers and businesses, with the Flat High Performance Dish and Enterprise Dish being the most common for commercial use. Given that we at Metro Wireless are an official Starlink solution provider with 100s of sites deployed and managed both in and outside the USA,  we put both dishes in a head-to-head test in our lab to see how they perform against each other!
In this blog post, we’ll compare their specifications, performance, and ideal use cases to help you choose the best option.

Starlink Flat High Performance Dish

The Starlink Flat High Performance Dish was the original commercial-level dish sold by Starlink for users who demanded the fastest speeds, lowest latency, and highest uptime reliability, especially in extreme environments.

Featuring a larger, more robust design than Starlink’s consumer dishes, it delivers superior performance in harsh weather conditions, such as heavy rain, snow, or high temperatures. With enhanced triple phased-array antennas and improved processing power, it ensures lower latency and higher bandwidth compared to the standard Starlink dish. 

This makes it ideal for businesses, remote workers, and adventurers who need dependable, high-speed internet in challenging locations. 

The Flat High Performance Dish is also compatible with in-motion use, providing seamless connectivity for maritime, aviation, and mobile applications.

Starlink Enterprise Dish

The Starlink Enterprise Dish is a newer offering from Starlink that’s intended for commercial users.

While not as ‘beefy’ as the High Performance Dish, it still has a larger, more robust design than standard Starlink residential terminal.

Like the High Performance dish, it of course supports high-demand applications like video conferencing, cloud computing, and large-scale data transfers, making it ideal for enterprises, government agencies, and emergency responders

Starlink’s low-latency, global coverage ensures seamless connectivity even in areas with limited infrastructure. 

Starlink Flat High Performance Dish
Size comparison of Starlink Enterprise and Flat High Performance dishes
As a Starlink Authorized Solution Provider, Metro Wireless proudly offers and supports both the Flat High Performance and Enterprise Dishes.

Getting down to business: hardware specifications comparison

Below is a detailed comparison of Starlink’s Enterprise Dish and Flat High Performance Dish hardware specifications:

Dish specifications comparison
Dish specifications comparison
Specification Enterprise Dish Flat High Performance Dish
Environmental rating IP54 IP56
Power consumption ~100W (avg) ~110W (avg)
Field of view 110° 140°
Snow melt capability Up to 40 mm/hour (1.5 in/hour) Up to 75 mm/hour (3in/hour)
Weight 26.8 lbs 35.8 lbs
Dimensions 23" x 15" 26" x 18"
Cable length 50 ft 75 ft
Cost as of April 2025 $699 $2,500

We lab-tested stated versus actual performance comparison

What Starlink reports is the expected performance for the Flat High Performance and Enterprise dishes

Information from Starlink’s website
Dish model performance comparison
Dish model performance comparison
Model Download Speed Upload Speed Latency
Enterprise Dish 150-250 Mbps 20-40 Mbps 25-50 ms
Flat High Performance Dish 200-350 Mbps 30-50 Mbps 20-45 ms
Note: Speeds may vary based on location and network congestion.
Flat High Performance speed test result
Flat High Performance Dish speed test result
Enterprise Dish speed test result

To our surprise: In a single speed test the Flat High Performance Dish and Enterprise Dishes performed at similar speeds with similar latency.  

While the FHP dish benefited from a faster download speed, the Enterprise dish edged out its more expensive sibling on upload speed. Similarly, the Starlink Enterprise dish had slightly, though perhaps immaterial, better latency performance.

NOTE: While we didn’t publish other speed tests results, we did run multiple speed tests from multiple speed test providers like Ookla’s Speedtest.net. Again, we didn’t see materially different performance results between these two dishes!

Unfortunately, it’s tough for us to test 1)  uptime performance and 2) snowmelt performance at the moment. However, the Flat High Performance dish should perform materially better than the Enterprise dish in those categories due to its larger field of view (better chance of ‘seeing’ a satellite at any given time), and better snow melt heat rating.

We have a lot of northern hemisphere clients who deal with ice and snow.

So, which dish is right for your business?

Here are some key factors to consider :

  1. Enterprise Dish: Best for small to medium businesses needing reliable speeds at a lower cost.
  2. Flat High Performance Dish: Ideal for mission-critical operations requiring maximum uptime performance, and better weather resistance. We also think this dish will last longer in the field due to its better build quality, containing a metal frame, etc.

Conclusion

We deploy a lot of Starlink for our clients, and we believe the Enterprise dish will be fine for 80% of our user base. The near same speed performance and affordability make the Enterprise dish an attractive choice.

However, for our clients who demand the highest uptime, dish build quality, and snow-melt capabilities, we’ll continue to recommend the Flat High Performance dish.

Shameless plug: Metro Wireless is proud to sell and support both the  Flat High Performance and Enterprise Dishescontact us today at sales@metrowireless.com and experience the future of seamless connectivity!

Tyler Hoffman

CEO

He serves as the owner and CEO of Metro Wireless, a Detroit-MI based company that delivers better commercial connectivity via wireless solutions to a national client base. He lives in Detroit, and holds an MBA from Kellogg @ Northwestern University, and a BBA from Ross @ University of Michigan. His guilty pleasures include craft beer and horror films.

BLOG HOME